WAQAR AHMED versus SHAUKAT ALI
Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 85 (3) Appeal against acquittal by the High Court Prosecution In its own statement, instead of relying on the weaknesses of the defendant's defense, independently set his own case. Was bound to do. Under Section 2342, the CRPC did not prove a charge of dismissal in its defense to establish a prosecution case for the perpetrators of the crime, no doubt, in the absence of any further evidence of the prosecution. Admittedly, prosecution witnesses denied the defendant's self-defense when the shooting indicated by the accused during his investigation was indicated by the FIR, but none of the investigating agency events were vacated by the incident. Was not recovered, the prosecution revealed in a manner that ocular testimony was neither credible nor relied upon. The affidavit of the High Court finding was that the suspect's involvement in the suspected crime was based on evidence and no interference with justice and fairness was guaranteed, according to the Supreme Court. Permission to appeal to the complainant was denied by R2047 Ref.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Tarbela lawyer