Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAZZAQ versus GHULAM MUSTAFA

Section 13 (3) Conan testimony (10 of 1984), Article 76 The evidence of the pre-trial testimony tab e Ashdad was sent by a registered post confession because Wendy refused to receive such notice. And the validity of such notice in the photocopied evidence had to be proved under the law by presenting a document that was to be contested with the minor witnesses, but neither the original notice was presented to the defendants nor Upon denial, a request for secondary evidence was transferred regarding whether the letter registered by postal receipt was sent. In fact, notices or blank envelopes were actually sent to the defendants, it was not proved that the record was not presented and was not proved by the minor witnesses, nor was the performance of the students' testimony. It was proved that the evidence of the High Court was not guaranteed to be misread or not to be proved famous lower court advocate from Hattar lawyer