Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence did not include any element of prompt filing, deliberation and counseling in the case; one of the witnesses was terminated before the trial began, before the prosecution. Two other prosecution witnesses, who were genuine victims of the deceased's brother and the accused's mother, were fully supportive of the trial and defense case, despite lengthy scrutiny, which could not have contributed to the prosecution's story. It is stated that two witnesses said that the witnesses happened in the house of the witnesses, they were the most natural witness of the incident and He had no false intentions and no other accused was falsely implicated, but his real nephew's ocular account was presented by two eyewitnesses, using medical evidence to defend him. The two defense witnesses presented by the defendant for support were fully affirmed, the accused's real brother and sister, and both had criminal proceedings with the defendant's statements stating that the defense witnesses were not credible. , Especially when it was a partial settlement which would not have been entered into by all of the late legal heirs and such. They could not be favored by the plea of defense, in which case, the accused had been absconding with the law for eight months, who also identified the accused conscience conscience, who had given his original father. Day was deliberately murdered in the light of the body, it seemed that he was a dishonest person and did not deserve any relaxation in the punishment of the crime. Be registered against the accused by the trial court criminal advocate from Jhand lawyer