ALLAH DITTA versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 The testimony of the witnesses, although very closely related to the witnesses, could not be termed an interesting witness because they did not prove that there was any strong motive for the false interference of the accused. Or the enmity was placed but it was alleged that he was not equipped with any weapons. When he arrived at the scene of the incident and while he was lifting the handle of the water hand pump, he sustained a minor injury to the casualty's arm, which was not fatal, he did not repeat the blow, which means He had no problem. The intention to commit the murder of the accused was behind bars and he faced a lengthy trial and appealed for more than ten years. The accused had already been sentenced to life in prison for what happened.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer
