MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Defining the evidence of section 9 (b), the trial court upheld the allegations and allegations against the defendants' trust which could be believed. The trial court accepted the ocular account, the evidence of the recovery, and said that the prosecution has, without any doubt, been able to prove the accused guilty. Under Section 9 (b) of the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997, and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. With the benefit of RI fine and Section 382B, the CCPC High Court agreed to the end of the trial court and there was no serious defect. The indictment against the accused proved that 250 gram of chance was recovered from his possession, the High Court may have already completed his term while retaining the sentence imposed by the trial court. n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Khewra lawyer
