Find a Lawyer

FATEH SHER versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence was the brother of the accused, the defendant's accused and the prosecution's witnesses were not only related to the accused, but also related to the accused, to replace the accused witnesses for the real killer There is no reason, both of the prosecution witnesses were cross-examined extensively, but they remained firm on all material aspects of the case, saying the prosecution's witnesses were also confirmed by the circumstances of the case and the ocular account. Medical evidence was also assisted, the knife allegedly recovered from the accused, the blood did not stain, the piece of evidence fueled the prosecution's case. The prosecution did not successfully prosecute the defendant through an ocular version that was credible and the trust-inspired prosecution also received support from medical evidence and the circumstances of the case, especially F. The IR's immediate enrollment was the victim's older brother. And he was more than eighty years old on the date of the incident, the accused had a single blow with a knife and did not repeat it, because of this process, the accused lost his real brother, while the accused He was sentenced to life imprisonment while maintaining the sentence, according to divorce advocates from Nilam lawyer