ZAFAR IQBAL versus HABIB BANK LTD.
Section 2A & 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Premature retirement Golden Hand Shake Scheme, Beneficiaries of the applicant Bank Bank employees applied for premature retirement on 10 5 1996 1996 Which was accepted by the applicant after which 14 2 1998. Retirement wanted to take advantage of the Golden Hand Shake Scheme, which was rejected by the bank The applicant was not allowed to withdraw his previous application for premature retirement, therefore, the applicant benefits of the Golden Hand Shake Scheme. None of them were eligible, after submitting a pre-retirement request, the applicant joined another bank and received salaries for a period of 19 months on a pre-retirement request, so, During this period neither can claim benefits of salary etc. Nor can the benefit of the Golden Handshake scheme be enhanced because it was announced only when the applicant had already joined another bank decision approved by the service tribunal that the Supreme Court's leave to appeal. From Mian Mahmood Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court rejected and Faiz-ur-Rehman, Advocate on Record for Petitioner Growth Respondents \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Kotri lawyer