Find a Lawyer

KHALIL-UR-REHMAN versus TAJ DIN

Section 8 and 39 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 91 and 120 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Suit for occupation without getting rid of registered sale deed, finding of limitation solidarity Discovery by the courts. The petitioner was that such limitation of Article 91 of the Limitation Act 1908 would not be authorized and the same limits would be governed under Article 120 of the Act, 1908. It was raised by the respondent that such question Article 91 of the Demarcation Act, 1908, will proceed and the appellate court rightly dismisses the case, which was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decisions, and rejected the appeals granted by the courts, rejected by Hamida Begum and Murad Begum and other PLD 1975 SC 624. Lalu and another V Ghulaman 2000 SCMR 1058 and Shamshad Ali Shah and another V Syed Hassan Shah and others PLD 1964 SC 143 Reif Cha Ali Muhammad, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner Mian Muzaffar, Advocate Supreme Court and Respondent Advocate on Veterans Records immigration advocates from Depal Pur lawyer