MUJAHID PERVAIZ versus MATTIULLAH
Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The High Court adopted a safe way to convert the death sentence of the accused to life imprisonment; the victim used derogatory language against the accused's mother. It was humiliating and the provocative only one bullet was attributed to the accused and he did not deserve the extreme death penalty in those circumstances. In this case, the two accused had already been acquitted by the trial court. Is due to the wounds inflicted on the victim. Only one person and the accused accused were rightfully acquitted by the High Court on the benefit of the doubt, though the verdict did not deal with any legal weakness, even otherwise, for leave to appeal. Was not appropriate, the complainant was denied permission to appeal. According to the Supreme Court, Sardar Mohammad Latif Khan Khosa, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner MA Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry for the respondents ecord
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Lahore lawyer