MAJOR (R) FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF MALIK
O XVIII, R 16 and O III, R 5 Constitution Pakistan, Arts 199 Constitutional Appeal Option to Examine Witness Case for Prosecutor Plaintiff (Defendant) Date of Pre-Position as One of the Trial Moved the petition before the trial court to decide. The witnesses had to depart abroad, and for this purpose, the air ticket of the witness presented to the court was also shown, notices were issued to the defendant (applicant) on several dates, and the defendant's lawyer was sent by him. The service was implemented. Who claimed that the defendant was a foreigner so his personal services were affected. At trial, the court found that defendant's lawyer's lawyer's statement was intact, and therefore, the lawyer's service was complete, and proceeded to terminate the right to a temporary interim examination of the witness. As a question, when there was no submission by the defendant against the trial court's order, clause order XVIII, rule 16 of the CPC was also rejected, if any witnesses were in the court's jurisdiction. If the option was to be relinquished, or if there was any other reason available, the court could record the evidence of such witness immediately, moving the applicant well over time and, despite repeated notices, the defendant's personal The service may not be effective, but the defendant's counsel was sustained by the lawyer through the lawyer, but it was the lawyer's personal service. Rudder III, Rule 5, could not insist upon the CPC, provided the court proceeded. The party, through its applicant, and the applicant in whose favor the ak lawyer is officially named
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
