MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB
Article 18 (6) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 173 Changing / Exchanging Investigations After Submission of Invoice The Scope Investigation Officer conducted a thorough investigation of the case and during the investigation the accused were acquitted and trial. Invoice was presented to the court The Special Standing Board's recommendation made under Article 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002, was discussed after the accused presented the challan, pursuant to Article 18 (6). ) The validity compensation could not be transferred. In the Police Order, 2002, it was pointed out that the law gives the Constitution Board the authority to recommend a re-investigation where the board had recommended a re-investigation of the matter even after the challan was presented. Could not be banned and there was no witness to the prosecution. To date, the accused persons have not been able to convince the court that under this process the process of investigation was not re-processed or the transfer of the investigation was serious. Under Article 18 (6) of the Police Order 2002, the effective order of transfer of investigation was not to suffer any illegal interference or misuse of any of the powers under the constitutional application.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
