HAJI BASHIR AHMAD versus CANE COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB
R17 Sugar Factories Control Act (XXII of 1950) Sections 6 and 6A West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 80 Constitution Pakistan was the cultivator of the scope of such controversy and was the unclean order of the Ken Commissioner. Under which he refused to hear the claim that he was not authorized to decide the matter and that the decision of the Civil Court should be decided by the Ken Commissioner. The owner of the sugar mill was not available and the matter was related to the crushing season of 1998. Under the Punjab Punjab Sugar Factories Control Rules 1950, the Commissioner of Cannes was authorized to decide the claim of the applicants and he also referred the dispute to arbitration. Can give The Can Commissioner can recover the amount through the methods prescribed in Section 80 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967. When the Collector's powers were available to the Commissioner, the High Court directed the Can Commissioner to decide on the applicant's claim, Under the circumstances, constitutional application is allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
