AHMAD KHAN versus STATE
Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), 5 368 Definition of Evidence, The statements of both the complainant and his daughter / alleged abductor were not reliable and the affective son of the complainant was not the complainant. 'S sister was charged with kidnapping. The accused trial court erred in convicting the accused on the life imprisonment under Section 11 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, as there was no evidence to prove the abduction case against the trial court's accused. Was not available. The charges were laid, the charges were set aside and the accused acquitted. It was alleged that the complainant / alleged kidnapper's daughter, his legally married wife, and relying on the bride, did not challenge the alleged abductor conviction through a trial. had gone. In view of the background and history of the case, the court against the accused was extremely violent, sentenced to 25 years imprisonment, reduced to ten years
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Chaman lawyer