Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMAD KHAN versus STATE


Sections 10 (3) and 11 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), 5 368 Definition of Evidence, The statements of both the complainant and his daughter / alleged abductor were not reliable and the affective son of the complainant was not the complainant. 'S sister was charged with kidnapping. The accused trial court erred in convicting the accused on the life imprisonment under Section 11 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, as there was no evidence to prove the abduction case against the trial court's accused. Was not available. The charges were laid, the charges were set aside and the accused acquitted. It was alleged that the complainant / alleged kidnapper's daughter, his legally married wife, and relying on the bride, did not challenge the alleged abductor conviction through a trial. had gone. In view of the background and history of the case, the court against the accused was extremely violent, sentenced to 25 years imprisonment, reduced to ten years

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Chaman lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.