MOHSIN SALEEM versus STATE
Articles 10 (2) and 11 of the Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), definition of section 109 evidence. The two defendants had compromised with the complainant and the victim, and it is reported that both the complainant and the alleged victim were properly compensated, though the parties have arrived. In any settlement, but under the offenses in which the offenders were convicted, they were not guilty or will be guilty of compromise by a party, so it is not enough to make a decision in the appeals itself. Of course, the complainant was neither a witness to the alleged abduction, nor would the commission's alleged adultery be construed as a hearsay evidence. Which was not admissible even from the evidence, unless the person to whom the complainant had heard it was examined as a witness, the complainant's statement had no benefit, even the medical evidence, By the way, Victim was not a baby girl in advance. He had given birth to a child, but mere pregnancy of a woman or giving birth to her child, on its own, cannot be considered sufficient evidence to prove the guilt of the alleged offender, in the absence of evidence, Can be guaranteed. The accused, in any case, had to extend the benefit of the doubt to the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Piaro goth lawyer