Find a Lawyer

WARIS ALIAS WARSI versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), section 510 have not claimed any witnesses who saw the accused committing adultery or committing fornication on dead evidence. In which the evidence was relied upon by the trial court. The Chemical Examiner's report that it had swabs sent for testing was found stained with semen. The SEED report never proved to be valid, even though Section 510, the CR PC, did not call the Chemical Examiner without calling the Chemical Examiner. The report was allowed to be produced, but this would not mean that any such report produced under this provision of the law should have been taken as a proven document, as the Chemical Examiner's report The doctor's statement contradicted the medical evidence that there was no injury to or near the anal canal. The prosecutor's confession, which was withdrawn, did not prove, in the circumstances where the evidence of extra-judicial evidence on the victim was made, the confessional confession before the prosecution's witness was not believed by the trial court itself. In the absence of proven evidence, conviction cannot be recorded on the basis of a confessional conviction; in such cases, keeping the record on the evidence, the accused failed to prove the accused's connection with the commission of the offense. ), Can be punished under PPC only when it is proved that he committed the murder of Qadal Amad and it was proved that he had committed a The man was killed for which he is being punished, but this was not proven on the record. The accused committed that the trial court made the allegations power of attorney advocate Mangal Sada lawyer