Find a Lawyer

MST. AKHTAR BANO versus UMAR BAZ

Sections 190 (2), 193, 200, 247 and 439 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 11, dismiss the Complaint Amendment for non-prosecution reinstatement. Dismissed due to absence and the application for rehabilitation was also dismissed, the petitioner challenged that the order of the revision session judge rejecting the complaint and rejecting the grievance request. On, challenged that there was no provision in the CRPC to recover the complaint, the complaint was filed directly by the complainant. The session was never presented to the court and the magistrate, while under the law no Session of Session, except, by PC or under any other law, was capable of taking any offense seriously, Unless it is referred to a magistrate under section 9090 under under. (2), the delivery of CR PC 5 3 193, the CR PC was clear under both offenses, namely, the offense of adultery under Sections 10 and 11 (NF Ordinance of Ordinance, 1979, whereby the complaint was comprehensible and non- The complaint was filed because of a combination, the complaint could not be dismissed for illegal prosecution. The Federal Shariat Court accepted the review and set aside the dismissal order, approved by the session judge. And the case was remanded to the trial court for its decision in accordance with law. immigration advocates contact from Chaman lawyer