Article 13 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 113 suit pre-exploited Tolb e Publication, Notice Proof The evidence raised by the pre-emptor was when the shopkeepers acknowledged the receipt of the toll e notice. In this case there was no need to confirm the accuracy of the two witnesses where the shopkeepers refused to acknowledge the performance of the petition or refused to serve any notice on the pre-emptor, in which case the witnesses were to be presented. Who had signed the notice and had to prove the delivery by submitting the receipts and hence the post office They provide notices to show the impact of their service. In fact, the facts of the student testimony were recognized, so, in the jurisdiction of the amendment, no evidence was required to prove the performance of the student-judge High Court. The statement, allowing the umpire to stand trial for the payment of the balance of costs, was set aside by the two courts and the decisions taken together.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
