Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Appeal Court granted permission for two new plaintiffs (applicants) to implement the scope application, scope application for division of OI, R10 suit on the ground that the process of gifting for suit property was in their favor. Because the gift process was implemented during the time it was due. Under the parties, the final outcome of the gift process depends on the final outcome of the lease between the parties and, prior to this, the applicants could not claim that they were the necessary party, the appellate court order was set aside. , Under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ABDUL JABBAR v. State 2013 MLD 130
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. AAMIR HAMEED 2013 CLC 131
• MUHAMMAD SHOAIB alias SHOABI v. State 2013 YLR 131
• Ch. IRSHAD ALI SAJID v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PLD 133
• MUHAMMAD MAJEED v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2013 MLD 135
• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. NAZAR AHMED 2013 YLR 139
• SAJID IQBAL v. State 2013 MLD 140
• Syed IMRAN ALI SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Human Resources (HR) Division, Islamabad 2013 PLC 143

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

patent advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes