Sections 114 and 12 (2) of the revision request disclosed to the complainant who wishes to review the order of the High Court which was rejected by the complainant of the previous order of the High Court Counsel for the complainant. Had failed to do. ) The accused succeeded in passing the bail. The complainant (petitioner) filed an application for cancellation of bail, saying that he would not suppress the request provided the High Court directed the trial court to terminate the trial as soon as possible. The accused (the defendant) then filed a constitutional petition before the High Court seeking the termination of the FIR, which was allowed and the FIR was declared invalid (petitioner). The application filed under the CPC was filed against the FIR being declared invalid. It was also obtained by practicing fraud and misrepresentation. The High Court upheld the cancellation of the FIR order without appreciating that the bail was in contravention of the directions passed in the first order of cancellation. The termination of the order of the FIR, similar to that which was approved in the presence of the complainant's lawyer, was recorded from the record submitted in the presence of the same lawyer during the constitutional petition proceedings for termination of the FIR. The complainant's lawyer did not bother to point to the High Court. The High Court had earlier approved the bail cancellation request, therefore, the complainant's later request that the termination of the FIR order was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation, without any power. Was not, under section 12 (2), the complainant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
