Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR

For the specific performance of the Section 12 suit agreement, the plaintiff claimed that he had contracted with the defendant to sell the suit property, which was the father of the minor, for further consideration that the plaintiff claimed that he paid a large sum. And the agreement was to be implemented by the mother. On giving legal notice to the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff informed the plaintiff that the minor's mother was not ready to perform the sale in favor of the plaintiff, the plaintiff may withdraw the money paid by her, The plaintiff files a lawsuit, instead of receiving the money. For the specific performance of the contract, which was rejected by the trial court, but by the appellate court, the reasonable plaintiff had deliberately ruled that the plaintiff (father) did not have the authority to prosecute the minor son, It acted illegally to seize the property of modest conduct. The plaintiff who did not do the groundwork was dubious The plaintiff was not in favor of receiving the defendant twenty bucks, but he was entitled to what he actually gave him. us immigration advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer