Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ ALIAS GHASEETAY KHAN versus MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

Section 8 and 42 of the Transferred Property Act (IV of 1882), the possession of the suit 122 and the execution of the declaration, the evidence of the plaintiff's real brother left a daughter dead and the deceased widow's daughter had taken away the property which was allegedly taken. As he had changed. The gift is certified in favor of the defendant in the interest of the defendant, who was the maternal uncle of the deceased defendant's daughter, under whose declaration of occupation he allegedly challenged the conversion of the gift and his Part of the inheritance was claimed to be the real mother of the executive / daughter. The deceased brother's trial court ruled that the case, which was set aside on appeal, the plaintiff filed a review petition against the appellate court's defendant's decision, which was actually beneficial to the undesirable change, under the law. It was necessary to set aside the two incidents, namely, when the alleged gift was presented and the acceptance as well as the possession, and secondly, the Assistant defendant before the alleged defendant himself. The gifts were presented and accepted by them before they were exchanged and the two presented by the defendant. The plaintiffs did not deny the fact of the fact that the certiorari affirmation and the offer of the gift were neither presented nor muttered about the fulfillment of the officials nor did the two witnesses support the defendant's version of such evidence. Without production in the box, there can be no basis for finding the respondent's endorsement by the Revenue Officers, in which case the defendants cannot be relied upon. Both sides of the issue attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hayatabad lawyer