Find a Lawyer

JAMIL & COMPANY versus DISTRICT COUNCIL

Sections 7 and 8 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), suit for declaration of section 42, auctioning rights for failure to submit 1/10 of the auction bid rights to collect tax on the transfer of immovable property The appellant was the highest bidder. The tax on the transfer of immovable property in the district bid by the appellant was Rs. 1,11,00,000 and as per Punjab Local Council (Lease) Rules 1990 R7, 1/10 of the total amount was 11, 10,000 came in, was to be deposited by the appellant but initially the appellant deposited Rs. 5,00,000 and after that the appellant had deposited Rs. 8,85,000. Was less than the 10th amount. In the Punjab Local Council (Lease) Rules, R7 (1) of 1990, the appellate court rightly dismissed the case filed by the appellant as he failed to fulfill his promise to submit a bid amount. Failure which was Rs 11,10,000 required R7 of Punjab Local Councils (Lease) Rules, 1990 Appellant erred in his work and error under R8 of Punjab Local Council (Lease) Rules 1990, 8,45, 000 was deposited. li r \ n law websites from Chicha watni lawyer