Find a Lawyer

FALAK SHER THROUGH L.RS. versus MST. FIRDOUS AKHTAR

Sections 12, 42, 52 and 53 of Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 59 Agreement for sale of affidavit in the interest of the defendants by the plaintiff / forerunner, with a request certified by two witnesses of the development authority The transfer of land by the adviser to the plaintiff was transferred by the plaintiff to the plaintiffs' case before the declarations filed by the present defendants and withdrawn when the case was determined to make a decision, the plaintiff. Submitted witnesses who confirmed the documents in question, why the present case could not be presented That he had died but in his initial case his statement had finally proved the sale of the lambardar, which in the first case had presented the plaintiff / predecessor to the deputy prosecutor, in the present case, the court , However, his signature was confirmed by a statement from the handwriting expert, and his refusal to sign the affidavit was again relied upon, being an incredible promoter, who was an employee of the Board of Revenue and the land. Couldn't explain why he signed a blank paper when asking someone. That's not included in the litigation anywhere. In the interests of the defendants / advisers, the transaction was proved by the predecessor in favor of the plaintiffs and one of the counsel's legal representatives recognized that it was illegal in the exercise of jurisdiction by the appellate court. The result was by the seller's appellate decree. Was not sustainable which was set aside and the trial court inheritance advocates near Phagwar lawyer