Evidence available on record in violation of Para 25 Land Reform Regulation 1972 [MLR No 115], Para 24 Agricultural Land Sales Mutation, violation of MLR No. Violation 64, has proven that before the original Altai / Lady Seller Was sold on behalf of the applicants. Variable variations did not reduce its habitat to less than a livelihood, thus holding the mutation was completely effective and could not be ruled out under MLR number 64, subsequently applying. In favor of the two sales, being the owner of the estate, it was also a legal appellate decision and the wrong decision was not legally lasting, therefore, they were set aside when the trial court's findings were affirmed by the High Court. ?????
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
