Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM YASIN versus ABDUL KARIM


The trial case for the trial of Articles 6 and 13 has been filed by the plaintiff that the accused was not proved by the plaintiff as neither the author of the notice nor the two witnesses were questioned. The trial court was fully justified in presenting the plaintiff in its entirety. The petitioner below failed to prove the terms of section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 in connection with the Court of Appeal, which overturned the trial court's finding, did not accept the material aspect of the case. The reasoning for the hearing was completely ignored. Appellate Decision and Decision Due to the jurisdiction of the illegal jurisdiction, the decision and order of the appellate court were set aside and the trial court's decision and decision restored.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Gharo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.