MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR versus MST. KANIZ FATIMA
Section 8 except that the plaintiff's previous action against the plaintiff, Jamabandi, Khasra Gudwari was presented in the copies of the evidence and the report of the local commission appointed by the testimony of one of the plaintiffs of the court clearly states that the defendant had filed the case. Had crossed the earth. The plaintiff did not present any credible evidence to show the defendant's contention on the suit land that outlined the judgment affecting accuracy, in which such evidence was not considered or the High Court did not accept the appeal. That was, the unwanted verdict / order was set aside and the trial is set for trial in the trial court. After keeping all the evidence on record, fresh \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Khair Pur lawyer
