The testimony of the Section 9 (c) Chemical Examiner did not support the report of the prosecutor, and while the trial was underway, the Area Magistrate had to prepare fresh parcels without issuing any notice to the accused and without the trial court's permission. Was applied for. Separate parcels were handed over to police officers, who instead of sending the chemical examiner to the chemical examiner, sent them to another chemical engineer in a different city who, after eleven months, voted in favor. Submitted before the property trial court and the trial has begun, the area magistrate was left with no option to tamper with the property of the trial, without giving notice to the accused without the trial court magistrate's permission. Get permission from the trial court. Receiving fresh reports from another Chemical Examiner, prosecution evidence, especially witnesses, the Rehabilitation and Investigation Officer, who drafted the complaint, was not charged again, under serious circumstances by the prosecution witness. The prejudice was expressed and at the same time the area magistrate accused had the fundamental right to be dealt with according to the law, proving to be an affront to the police. The fact is that although the chemical Examiner working in the original location requested fresh samples, he was not sent, but was sent to the Chemical Examiner of choice at the different location, the different Chemical Examiner's The aftermath of the report was useless in the circumstances in which it was alleged. Already faced more than three years \ RI and nine months in prison
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
