Section 39 law evidence (10 of 1984), Article 17 suit was ordered to cancel the contract to sell the suit, but the order in the appeal was set aside The incorrect recording effect of the evidence The entire proof of the plaintiff The effect was that the alleged deal was fraudulent. Is ready and the plaintiff never agreed to sell the disputed property to the defendant. Therefore, the final sentence of the plaintiff's testimony, ie, it is true that Rs. 20,000 has been recovered and the property has been sold only. It may be taken as incorrect recording of the plaintiff's evidence that the defendant failed to present the slightest testimony to the agreement, after Prima facie was proved in favor of the plaintiff's appeal order and was dismissed by the High Court. Was restored. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
