Find a Lawyer

NAZIR BEGUM versus AURANG ZEB THROUGH L.RS.

Section 8 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), the suit that occupied section 17 suit, was dismissed but the question of determining the title of the verbal sale decision by the partner, although requested by the defendant in the previous case The declaration was rejected because they did not produce any registrations. The sale agreement in their favor in relation to the suit land worth more than Rs 100, but the fact that they were not the owners of the disputed land did not automatically mean that they were the claimant claimants who were the shareholders of the suit land. Can be. If they had either proved that the seller / partner had sold their full rights and, therefore, they could not give any award in the disputed land or in the alternative, if they presented evidence on record. They show that only those who are entitled to measles can be satisfied. If this disputed land was included in their section, then the plaintiffs wanted to establish their title through their evidence but failed to prove their case by applying the title in the wrong premises to the appellant's decision in the previous litigation. And the decision was resolved because it was not stable, it was set aside and the trial court's results were affirmed by the High Court. best advocate from Kot Addu lawyer