Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

The testimony of Section 302 (b) / 347f (iii) of testimony was established at the scene of the crime, but the witnesses did not tell the truth and deliberately concealed some facts. Form your opinion. The scene of the incident and the incident in which the two sides were linked together before the fatal injury, and during the clash, the deceased witnesses also had to confront and disperse the different parts of the witness. Had encountered What prompted the parties to quarrel and to start a dispute, was the mystery shrouded in the fact that no accused was equipped with a conventional or dangerous weapon, meaning that he was not on the verge of committing the murder. That led to the creation of the main accused. The deceased suffered only one injury and did not repeat, who denied the prosecution's version that his plan constituted the perpetrator of the offenses under section 302 (b) / 34, thereby maintaining the PPC. Was sentenced to life imprisonment. The co-accused did not cause any injury to the victim, and the witnesses did not hurt him or play any significant part. Neither his body nor nature were hurtful, so under Section 337F (iii) PPC, the perpetrator of the accused was retained, but his punishment was indicated to meet the limits of justice. Had already been reduced to a prison sentence. list of advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer