Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Sections 8 and 9 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Withdrawal Request The rental contract is not registered with the rent registrar not to collect 10% of the annual rent as a fine by the landlord while filing a eviction petition with the Rent Tribunal Accepted the withdrawal request in which such deposit was not required to the Criminal Property Rent Tribunal to see if such penalty was paid or not, but to pay such penalty between the landlord and the state. I can't afford landlord due to tribunal failure No one could take it. The benefit can be dismissed on account of non-payment of such penalty, but can also be resolved at the appeal stage. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition while instructing the landlord to submit 10% of the annual rent to the Tribunal at the specified time, otherwise. Their removal request will be dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Sheikh MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. State 2013 PCrLJ 252
• Hafiz RIAZ AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD YAMIN 2013 YLR 253
• FAROOQ SIDDIQUI v. Mst. FARZANA NAHEED 2013 PLD 254
• NATASHA HUSSAIN v. SHABBIR HUSSAIN 2013 PLD 257
• CHAIRMAN, SCACER CITIZEN COMMUNITY BOARD, MULTAN through Abdul Razak v. State 2013 PLD 259
• SHAHID NAZIR v. State 2013 YLR 260
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHUNIAN, DISTRICT KASUR 2013 MLD 264
• NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD AZAM 2013 PLD 264

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

ask a advocate free from Haveli Kahuta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes