CHAIRMAN, SCACER CITIZEN COMMUNITY BOARD, MULTAN THROUGH ABDUL RAZAK versus STATE
Articles 409 and 21 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application Criminal breach of trust by a public servant, Criminal corruption request to stop action, Definition of a public servant Rejects to the Scope Community Board The government funds provided by rejected government funds, such as public servants' officials, have been accused by government employees of the Scope of Community Board (applicants) for completing a project. Has used a large amount of money illegally, partially from the district government We were told by officials that they are not blind to the definition of civil servant, the judge, the action was arbitrary and was responsible for anti-corruption judge revoked. Judges, anti-corruption where funds were provided to any board by the state treasury for public purposes, such as those used to perform their duties using public funds, were considered public servants even though they were public servants. Or were not receiving salaries / compensation from public officials of the Community Board. The present constitutional petition also sought to resolve the factual dispute, which was the job of the judge, according to which the anti-corruption constitutional application was dismissed accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
