Sections 497 and 155 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 420/468/471 fraudulent and dishonest property use, use as a forged document as a forged document, use as a forged document guarantee , Denying the charge charged with the accused serious and unrecognizable offense as a result of the complainant in his settlement who had contracted the sale of his house and later promised to supply his possession. Allegedly contracted the sale of the same house in favor of one of the co-accused, resulting in a merger. The house was transferred in the name of his wife, the date and date of the conviction of the accused was unknown, as the FIR shows. The question is whether the property pending between the parties is a matter of civil litigation. That is, Sections 468 and 471 were PPC guaranteed while Section 468 was unrecognizable. The co-accused, who was the original suspect in the case, has already been granted bail, and since it is alleged that this does not fall within the prohibited provision of section 497, the circumstances of the CRPC case have revealed. That the accused kept both the complainant and the co-accused involved at the same time, leaving each of them to work hard under the impression that their contract was legally perfect and their claim was a complete fraud. And forgery by which he or she made a large amount of money from the complainant, and perhaps also from the co-accused and his spouse, where serious and unrecognizable fraud was found. There was a mix of EMs, the police did not have to get permission from the magistrate to investigate the prosecution, so
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
