MST. FATEH BEGUM THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus GHULAM SARWAR THROUGH L.RS.
Article 11 Legal evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 A second case challenging the validity of the same gift on the same charge, denying the first case before the Supreme Court, was dismissed by his next friend as a person of poor faith. The plaintiff stated that he had previously confessed to any mental thinking in the case and had made confessional gifts without coercion before the second case was before the Supreme Court decision in the Anti-Corruption petition. ? The first case, but his lawyer did not disclose another trial before the Supreme Court plaintiff could not assert such a request because his words and conduct excluded the second case. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
