Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMED versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU

Sections 9, 18 and 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Referring to the Accountability Court against a petitioner of a grant of bail was the allegation that he, being a deputy secretary, affiliated with another accused. The company awarded a construction contract at a high rate; that the applicant, who was also appointed as the arbitrator for settlement of the claim, was awarded the award against the applicant in conjunction with the agreed charge on both the cases until That cannot be proved unless there is sufficient evidence on record. , Depending on the circumstances of each case, and in such a statement no distrust can be removed so far as it was stated that the statement was read in accordance with the law charge against the applicant. As the mediator of the cross, dishonesty has gone ahead to award the contractor, the decision cannot be made without mentioning the circumstances which led to the rule of the court, the representative of the government in the civil court. Had appeared and objected to no pressure on the award; the court said the award of the rule of court was given by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Under Agur car, court rule and order will remain ineffective until accepted the award. According to Ed, such facts indicated that the case was a further investigation which could not be decided in any other way without the prosecution's record of detailed evidence, the applicant granted bail. In the circumstances, the allegations against the two co-accused were identical. advocates from Khuzdar lawyer