SAIF-UL-HAQ ZIAY versus MST. RAFIA KHANUM
Section 13 and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Dismissal Applicants / Tenant fulfilling the tenant's right to testify when not presenting their testimony, the rent controller issued an order Whether the right to present applicant's testimonies was terminated. By the controller of rent, a negotiator (for all intents and purposes), this order was because the lease was pending before the tenant and he had yet to make his final decision, and the legislature had in this regard I was specifically ordered to make a non-submission by giving an order. The constitutional petition was not enforceable on the basis of the second provision of section 15 of the West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance, 1959, when the legislature specifically prohibited the filing of an appeal against an interim order, if the constitutional petition should be Will be allowed to file against the order of the state, so if the exclusion of the intention of the legislature is to be defeated and revoked, the judgment against the applicant will be pronounced eventually. Will have the right to file an appeal under section 15 of 1959, which was raised by the applicant in the constitutional petition. Quiz / Foundations appeal shall be brought before the court. The rent controller will merge into a final order that can be seized before the courts can appeal, if a final order / decision will be finally granted against the applicant, if the alternative is alternative. , The constitutional petition cannot be retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mangal Sada lawyer