Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND ANOTHER versus SHAHID PERVIZ

Rr 3 (b) and 4 (1) (b) (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) forfeiture of GP Fund Advances on dismissal of employment, reduction of period three steps and recovery of embezzled money. The return of cash vouchers through cashier's association with returning government employees, in charge of the service tribunal on appeal, restored the government employees, but retained the fine of collection of money and reduced the time scale by a phase-in penalty. Maintained that the penalty imposed on civil servants was not appropriate as the cashier accepted the responsibility to forfeit such money through his oath. Had done. Confirmation of validity Government employees put on their signatures without proper certification and supervision Government employees were required to take extra vigilance in sensitive matters as responsible officers and were not required to confirm the payment without vouchers. The ability to take reasonable care and be vigilant in checking the bills, so that no mischief can be inflicted by the cashier's charge against the public servants as they were neither a party nor a fraudulent government benefiting from the transaction. To recover the financial loss to the government from yogurt Cometh. Cashier will not be suitable for public employees, Supreme Court partially accepts appeal while retaining penalty for partial reduction female advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer