COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS versus MESSRS MEDIA NETWORK
Sections 59 and 59 (1A) Self Assessment Scheme, (2002 2003), paragraphs 9 and 10 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 The selection of complete audit cases The issuance of policy guidelines before the declaration of the proper rating self-assessment scheme, (2002 2003), the Regional Commissioners of Income Tax, the Regional Commissioners of Income Tax approved by the Income Tax Authorities, regretting the selection of their cases, the authorities had submitted through the High Court Playa that the policy The instruction was not incorrect. There was no need for section 59 of the Contemporary Tax Ordinance 1979, either before or before the issuance of the Contemporary Scheme endorsement, or any other clause of the Ordinance for or before the issuance of the Guidelines. With the scheme on the provisions of section 59 (1A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, the income taxpayers would have been disappointed if informed. The possibility of tax evasion under the scheme cannot be ruled out if it is selected from the ore, cases or categories of individuals who will be selected for the total audit. Asbestis was required to submit its original statement under the scheme. As far as possible, the previous publication of the guideline for all tax evaders must have been grassy day, because they already know that as long as the Income Tax Authority has worked in all four cases, their cases are not selected or investigated. is being done. Section 59 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and the sale / assessment scheme and their power or authority were not misused, the temporary or / and final selection of cases for total audit obliged to select cases by regional There was no guiding principle. Commission
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer