Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR AND ANOTHER versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB

(1) (b) Employee dismissal irresponsible liability On the charge of wheat shortage, public servants were punished for their termination of employment and the order of recovering the price of wheat was approved by the Government employees. The source department maintained that the service tribunal pledged that they were awarded the huge dismissal on the basis of duty recognition that in the record of Pakistan Railway Center, government employees did not show huge quantities of wheat. As a result, the physical examination was detected and the only question that resulted was whether It is a matter of wheat root shortage or lack of center after shipment is supplied. Considering that the quantity of wheat was the result of short delivery of goods or transit, loss of debris in one leg. There is a shortage in the Pakistan Railway Center, therefore, it cannot be considered a short delivery case, no exemption can be taken by the service tribunal in search of the responsibility of the government employees' department. Outgoing services were tough and instead the mandatory retirement punishment would be enough to cover the end of justice. The Supreme Court received the dismissal from the employment of civil servants by turning it into compulsory retirement with the direction that it could be incurred in the event of loss of government. The terms of the jurisdiction order will be submitted by the public servants within three months. The Supreme Court has also directed that if the damages claimed by the Pakistan Railway Department are finally paid to the government. family advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer