Find a Lawyer

ATHAR H. ANSARI versus FEDERATIOON OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS

Arts 199, 212 and 25 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Constitution Petition Jurisdiction High Court scope petitioner was never promoted as a director. As a compulsory decision, it would be a case of fact that the question of fitness to promote someone related to the applicant's fitness for promotion was beyond the scope of the service tribunal's appeal. It is because the High Court had so much jurisdiction that it was not barred under Article 1212 of the Constitution, no matter whatever the purpose pursued by Article 25 of the Constitution was mentioned and All public powers were allowed to persevere honestly and fairly. To the extent that the authorities were directed to consider the applicant's case strictly in accordance with law \ r \ n when you need a advocate from Bisham lawyer