Find a Lawyer

MST. FEROZA WAJID versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The plaintiff's widow, Plaintiff, of the Section 1 fatal crash suit damages, alleges that the road accident in which her husband was killed was caused by the negligence of the bus driver who was driving the car. Was struck in the back of a moving car. Her deceased husband, but said that the evidence of the police officer registering the FIR could not be said whether the negligence was caused by any negligence by the victim or the defendant's inquiry committee It was discovered that the victim had been tried. The defense bus driver gave the emergency horn a brake to avoid the accident and shifted his car to the left, was helpless and the defendant, the driver of the bus, was speeding ahead of another bus accident. In fact, from the evidence of the accident it was very difficult to ascertain exactly who caused the accident. The author said he appeared in court to present evidence that the possibility of negligence by the defendant as well as the victim could not be ruled out, but if the defendant drove his bus at normal speed Then it was not difficult for him. To avoid such a major accident, the defendants were jointly and severally obligated to pay the plaintiff and other legal heirs of the deceased, depending on the age of the defendant, his earning potential and other future prospects. Was fixed because the accident occurred due to negligence. Dead and defendant, losses were reduced by 25% according to which suit was ordered. best law firm from Matiari lawyer