AL-MADINA ELECTRIC STORE, DAHARKI, THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus HABIB BANK LIMITED
Sections 9, 10 and 21 apply for deferment of application for leave of application for elimination of suit application for loan receipt requesting that the appellant apply for loan approval and the loan and Had processed several inchomat documents to get loan facility. Although it was approved, it was never given to the appellant and the loan amount was passed by the bank manager to another person against whom the appellant complained to various senior persons. But no action was taken against the manager of the bank appellant. Arguing that he and his family members had deposited Rs. 6,00,000 through arrest threats, the trial court had copies of two documents allegedly executed by the appellant. Depending on, the leave to defend the application was dismissed and the bank filed a lawsuit, the appellant said that according to the two documents, the order and order of the trial court in the appeal is unknown, the bank has never filed a claim with the plaintiff. Was not presented with and the appellant did not have either the opportunity to be denied or the bank was told Regarding the documents that rely on these documents, either without giving the Appellant an opportunity to explain those documents or to specify their position on the documents, the former party contradicts them. Was. The procedure mandates that the applicants' application be dismissed and the trial and unclean verdicts, which were unfounded,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
