Find a Lawyer

AZIZULLAH SHEIKH versus UNION BANK LTD

Contrary to Section 9 (1) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 73, Example N was a credit card issued by the plaintiffs' bank complaint of recovering damages while they were abroad, while they were on various cards. Were presented. In places, despite the availability of credit in their account, the cards were not accepted and insulted. The plaintiffs claimed such action and the bank's negligence because they suffered mental aggravation due to their refusal to pay on the cards. In the first place, the plaintiffs learned that the cards were not working, that the plaintiffs themselves knew that they were not activated and that the cards were presented at various locations in the denial, so, due to the claim of fame, the humiliation was only known. There was loads of movement. If the plaintiffs were more careful, they would probably not use the cards once or twice after denial, but it would appear that he continued to present them wherever he came, even though the plaintiffs suffered mental agony, harassment and humiliation. But the plaintiffs' claim for damages was affected by the provisions of section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872, as set forth in the example (n) breach of the agreement was established, in favor of the plaintiff. It was only ordered that the suit be ordered according to the amount that the defendant had given to the defendant to avail of the facility. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mingora lawyer