Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus NASIR IBRAHIM

Article 42 Case Wapda affected the simultaneous orders of the courts under which the order of declaration filed by the respondents was declared by the respondents as illegal by the WAPDA tracking bill. , One of the defendants did not appear as a witness and the other defendant claimed that he had purchased the property or whose disputed bill had been issued but stated that the respondent had no contract of sale or his Cannot submit another title transfer document, Respondent has filed a complaint with WAPDA for indication Wasta can't even offer to change Wapda's name. Not only did the disclosure bill be presented, but also the section DOS which proved that the disputed bill was issued correctly to the registered user / bug / first responders, WAPDA proved this by providing evidence. That the seal and postal order affixed to the meter box was broken and that the first respondent was present at the time the meter was inspected, the respondent had failed to discharge, and evidence was not identified and could not prove that there was any one with the meter suit. The tampering was not done, in the event that WAPDA exercised its jurisdiction illegally and material irregularities, harmony. Defendant's evidence should not be excluded even if he did not present the defense evidence. The orders of the courts below were set aside pakistani advocates Ahmed pur Sial lawyer