Find a Lawyer

SALEEM ULLAH KHAN versus AMIR ALAM KHAN

Section 8 suit appellants claimed that the land measuring 16 Kanal and 14 Marla in the relevant measles number, which was owned by the eviction owner, was transferred to the interest of its predecessor, who said The land has been exchanged with the other person and this was said by the appellants. Another person has proved through registered land deed evidence through land registration that only 14 kanals and 14 mars of land belonging to the measles were allotted in advance in the interest of the predecessor while the central government, in this, Measles was shown. The remaining 2 Kanal Appellant owners could not show in their favor any order of the Department of Rehabilitation and Settlement approved allotment that the entire land (16 Kanal and 14 Marla) of the relevant measles number was allotted to their predecessor in interest. The controversial 2 canals have been declared controversial with the measles. The number was owned by the central government in the appellant. No one can claim ownership of the oats, he said. The source did not prove that it was otherwise superior, the appellate court dismissed the decision, and the trial court approved the case after it was absent. Appeal Court's unnecessary decision and error of any legal or factual finding in the decree, seeking intervention in the second appeal, was dismissed, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firm from Utror lawyer