GHULAM RASOOL versus ALLAH BAKHSH
Section 30 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the property in the tenancy suit for the specific performance of the Section 12 agreement, did not enforce the government as the plaintiff as a plaintiff and is also clear from this record It was not that the government was obliged to pay. The acquisition of proprietary rights was paid in respect of the suit land, not yet transferred to the defendants, the specific performance order could not be passed in favor of the plaintiffs, due to the specific performance of the agreements. Accordingly agreements will be required, waiting for the defendants to have possession of the rights, especially when the parties themselves are well aware of these limitations, agreeing that the implementation of the agreements delayed the delivery of the proprietary rights to the defendants. Will go
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Deh Pathaan lawyer