Find a Lawyer

TAHIR MAHMOOD ALIAS TAHRI versus STATE

Accused in his statement filed under Section 2342 (b) evidence testimony section 2342, the CCP had on the occasion confessed to his presence and claimed to be lying only in self defense. Kush was the cause of the incident - at which time the two sides opened fire and suffered only one injury to his face and had to do so according to medical evidence, the complainant was dishonest and material in the trial. The complainant was not a true witness and in his statement under Sec 342 to maintain the conviction on the murder charge taken by the accused Ahad cannot be relied upon in a non-source statement, the CCPC showed that he acted in self-defense at the time of the incident and had committed no crime under the circumstances. The prosecution even failed to prove it. It was alleged that the fire that struck the accused had killed the deceased, resulting in his death. advocate from Qambar lawyer