MEHAR versus STATE
Appraisal of section 13E Proof cannot be made on the fact that the accused was in open possession at the scene of the rifle's recovery, that the rifle was in his exclusive possession after being recovered, nor was the scene sealed. Nor was it sent to the Ballistic Express. The individual was not involved in the recovery process, nor was anyone in the area eligible to testify for the recovery process, so the rifle recovery was a clear violation of the provisions of section 103, alleging that the PC was Nine police are in custody. Day, the recovery of the weapons from him was very suspicious, the suspect was taken advantage of the doubt and acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Musakhel lawyer