Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus STATE

After investigating the testimony of sections 302, 504, 148, 149 and 114 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 193 and 439, the names of the accused were kept by the police in column number 2, but the department filed a complaint under the complaint. 193, CR PC, applicants / suspects were instructed by the Sessions Judge to appear in the case because the accused persons listen to his order and hurt the applicant (s), he has given legal status Was demanded and the property of the said order of Sessions Judge PR filed in the case. On the very day of the incident, the applicants were named as accused persons who stated that the FIR and their specific roles and actions against them were described in which the investigating officer was neutral. Not for the purpose of investigating, but for the sake of the accused took action to submit a medical certificate. It was intended to be issued by a doctor, but it lacks the competence of a physician, nor does the registration number have the exact address and date specified in it clearly tampered with the medical certificate. Was administered oath by two persons in favor of the suspected affidavits, their management was disclosed by a relative of the accused. Police made no attempt to arrest the accused and were provided instead. They were exposed to illegal protection by a trial court / session judge, concluding that it was legal and lawful to order. In the absence of any illegal movement or error, the same was retained and the request for review against the said order, best advocate from Bagh lawyer