MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD NAEEM
Section 15 (2) (ii) and (vii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Defaults on payment of rent and the personal need of the landlord The Rent Controller and the Appellate Court simultaneously apply to the applicants / tenants. Ordered out Question Both the courts were of the opinion that the applicant / tenant handles some incorrect receipts for the default period in question and these receipts were rejected Failing to satisfy the applicant's lawyer with a default threshold Because the burden was on the applicants to prove it. A tenant who fails to evacuate. In this regard, it was correct to search the courts below for the petitioner, in which case both the courts gave their information in favor of the respondents / landlord on the issue of personal necessity, as the respondent / tenant sought the right of the respondent. No effective evidence was brought against the defendant and the affidavit was given by the respondents, but was not denied. Nothing was available for the High Court's intervention in the constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer